At the beginning of each quarter, we rank each of the twelve ETF and Mutual Fund style categories from best to worst with our Style Ratings Report. These rankings are forward looking and are indicative of how each style should perform going forward.

Buy The Best & Worst Style ETF & Mutual Fund Reports

This analysis is available to our Platinum-level and higher members and enables investors to make better portfolio allocation decisions by identifying which funds to avoid and which funds to buy. More reliable & proprietary fundamental data, as shown in The Journal of Financial Economics, and shown to provide a new source of alpha, drives our research. Our Robo-Analyst technology[1] empowers our unique ETF and mutual fund rating methodology, which leverages our rigorous analysis of each fund’s holdings.[2]

Some of the best funds include MTUM, PROVX, FFTY, and MMCRX. Some of the worst funds include NSCS, PVFIX, XSHD, and CGMFX.

Last quarter’s Style Ratings can be found here. Last quarter’s Style Recap is available here.

The following are our style analyses for the third quarter of 2022.

This article originally published on July 22, 2022.

Disclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske II, Matt Shuler, and Brian Pellegrini receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector, style, or theme.

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and StockTwits for real-time alerts on all our research.

[1] Harvard Business School features the powerful impact of our research automation technology in the case New Constructs: Disrupting Fundamental Analysis with Robo-Analysts.

[2] See how our models and financial ratios are superior to Bloomberg and Capital IQ’s (SPGI) analytics in the detailed appendix of this paper.

Click here to download a PDF of this report.