Mid Cap Value Style 1Q17: Best and Worst

The Mid Cap Value style ranks tenth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our 1Q17 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter, the Mid Cap Value style ranked ninth. It gets our Dangerous rating, which is based on an aggregation of ratings of 8 ETFs and 126 mutual funds in the Mid Cap Value style as of January 31, 2017. See a recap of our 4Q16 Style Ratings here.

Figure 1 ranks from best to worst the six Mid-Cap Value ETFs that meet our liquidity standards and Figure 2 shows the five best and worst rated Mid-Cap Value mutual funds. Not all Mid Cap Value style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 21 to 673). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings.

Investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Value style should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2.

Here is our ETF and mutual fund rating methodology, which leverages our rigorous analysis of each fund’s holdings. We think advisors and investors focused on prudent investment decisions should include analysis of fund holdings in their research process for ETFs and mutual funds.

Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5

midcapvalue1q17_figure1* Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

ValueShares US Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) is excluded from Figure 1 because its total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.

Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5

midcapvalue1q17_figure2* Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

James Mid Cap Fund (JAMDX) is excluded from Figure 2 because its total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.

Direxion All Cap Insider Sentiment Shares (KNOW) is the top-rated Mid Cap Value ETF and Reinhart Mid Cap PMV Fund (RPMMX) is the top-rated Mid Cap Value mutual fund. Both earn an Attractive rating.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund (VOE) is the worst rated Mid Cap Value ETF and Intrepid Disciplined Value Fund (ICMCX) is the worst rated Mid Cap Value mutual fund. VOE earns a Neutral rating and ICMCX earns a Very Dangerous rating.

The Danger Within

Buying a fund without analyzing its holdings is like buying a stock without analyzing its business and finances. Put another way, research on fund holdings is necessary due diligence because a fund’s performance is only as good as its holdings’ performance. Don’t just take our word for it, see what Barron’s says on this matter.

PERFORMANCE OF HOLDINGs = PERFORMANCE OF FUND

Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Mid Cap Value ETFs and mutual funds.

Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst Funds

midcapvalue1q17_figure3

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Funds

midcapvalue1q17_figure4

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

This article originally published here on February 1, 2017.

Disclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske II, and Kyle Martone receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme.

Click here to download a PDF of this report

Leave A Response

* Denotes Required Field